Intelligence means an understanding of complex situations and an ability to understand that only some humans are cruel and potentially evil.The most obvious difference between the two games is (aside from being asynchronous) is that AWBW runs on Java, which means that certain operations have to be done in succession, rather than being a simple few button taps.įor example, in order to start capturing a city you must click a soldier unit, move it to a city, click it again and click “Capture”. First of all, most would agree that we're not as close as many would think and that AI doesn't necessarily mean the end of the world. Truth be told, artificial general intelligence is a bit overblown, to say the least. AI allows us to take the same data and draw varying conclusions with it, which means that any robot with true intelligence is perfectly capable of forming their own opinion. The biggest factor that people seem to ignore is that humans are generally intelligent creatures, and we've started who knows how many fights, wars, debates and the like? AI is often shown in movies working like a hive mind, with the whole species supporting the same cause, but that's not likely. Will artificial general intelligence be the nightmare some predict? Even so, please note that rats are actually quite smart. Facebook's head of AI, Yann Lecun, says that in terms of unfocused intelligence, robots are currently behind rats, even. In terms of actual intelligence, robots are way behind. The problem is that those machines were designed to do what they did. Really?Īrtificial general intelligence as a concept is often misleading because all around us we see robots beating humans at various games and we panic. The answers were somewhat startling, with the average answer falling within 50 years regarding everything from mathematics to surgery to writing novels. In a survey conducted in 2016, presented by 352 experts from various positions in the field tried to determine when robots would be able to perform any task better than a human. This is the best current example we have, but even those raise a few questions. A robot may defend itself if they can do so without violating the first or second law.
A robot must obey any orders a human gives them unless the order violates the first lawģ. A robot cannot harm a human or allow a human to come to harm by inaction.Ģ. This field is simply called Robo-ethics, and the best-known examples are Asimov's laws of robotics. Truth be told, there's an entire field dedicated to the moral issues created by the evolution of AI. They also tend to take a very gloomy outlook, when in reality, science isn't going in blind. The science fiction movies and books never seem to convey exactly how difficult it is for true sentience to be achieved. We're definitely making progress - it seems like there's a new step forward every day - but there's a lot left to do. The field of AI is immensely confusing, to say the least, despite the fact that more money is being poured into it every day. Some have argued that any sort of guess would be a stretch at this point. Self-Awareness Will Take A While, But It's Hard To Say Exactly When It Will Happen If we can't tell when a robot is pretending to be human, how will we be able to tell when they've reached true self-awareness? This is where the Turing Test trips us up again. Many would argue that, of course, it isn't, and that true awareness involves an awareness of self and the ability to form emotions, goals and desires outside the realm of physical needs. The ability to seem human to an observer is definitely a step towards true awareness, but is it true awareness in and of itself?
The problem is that even that definition has holes in it. If they still can't tell after the conversation, the robot has passed the test.
#ADVANCE WARS BY WEB AI CODE#
What exactly counts as thinking? If thinking is narrowed down to just problem-solving than we've already surpassed human-level AI.Īlan Turing, in addition to breaking the German code in WWII, created a test in which a person talks to a robot without being told it's a robot. The problem with using Descartes' model is that "thinking" is too vague.
0 kommentar(er)
